Report an error

How to report something

Use the correction form — it asks for exactly what we need, and every report is logged and timestamped so nothing gets lost.

Open the correction form →

Prefer email? corrections@topearners.net reaches the same place and is read by the same person. Use whichever is easier — neither is faster than the other.

Either way, include as much of this as you can:

• The page (paste the link) and the exact sentence or figure you're disputing.
• What's wrong, and what the correct information is.
• Any source or documentation that supports the correction — a primary document (a filing, a record, an official page) is the fastest path, because primary evidence is the standard we hold ourselves to.
• Whether you're the subject, represent the subject, or are a reader.

You do not need to claim a profile to report an error, and reporting one doesn't require agreeing with the rest of the page. If you are the subject and want to publish a response in your own words, that's a separate, also-free option — see claiming your profile.

What we do when you report

1. We acknowledge. We aim to respond within 5 business days.
2. We check it against the evidence. We re-examine the claim and its sources, the same way it was built — primary evidence first.
3. We correct verified errors. If it's wrong, we fix it and add a dated correction note so the record is transparent about what changed and when. Significant corrections are logged publicly.
4. We explain if we don't change it. If the material is accurate and fairly reported, it stays — and we'll tell you why, pointing to the sourcing. "Truthful but unflattering" is not an error.

Disputes

Sometimes the disagreement isn't a simple factual error — it's about framing, emphasis, or a conclusion drawn from the evidence. Here's how those are handled:

• Facts get corrected when shown to be wrong, as above.
• Framing and conclusions that are supported by the evidence and clearly labeled as analysis or opinion generally stand — but if you're the subject, you can publish a right of reply that appears on the page, unedited, in your words. That is the venue for "I see it differently."
• Allegations and open cases are reported as allegations and attributed. If the status of a case changes — a dismissal, a settlement, a ruling — send us the record and we'll update the profile to reflect it.
• Private or off-limits material. We profile the business persona, not the private person. If a page contains genuinely private personal information (a home address, family details, non-public personal data), flag it and we'll review it promptly on privacy grounds regardless of accuracy.

What isn't on the table

So that the process is honest with everyone who uses it:

• We don't sell removal. Taking down or softening accurate, fairly reported content is not something payment, an affiliate relationship, or a claimed profile can buy. That firewall is the reason the findings are worth anything.
• Claiming grants voice, not veto. A verified subject can reply and can correct their own links and offers, but cannot delete a dossier, change an income grade by paying, or remove a caution flag.
• A dispute isn't a takedown. Disagreeing with a conclusion doesn't remove it; the reply mechanism exists precisely so both views sit on the same page.

Corrections log

Pages state what is true now. This is where the record of what changed, and when, is kept.

• 11 September 2026, The Patterns. The first version, built on the ten dossiers that then carried a cross-reference block, reported a clean cohort split: the product-layer pattern confirming in every network-marketing file and failing in most affiliate files. Blocks were added to the remaining 29 research files the same day. At 39 subjects the split disappears, and the pattern fails at close to the same rate in both cohorts. The page was revised the same afternoon.
• 29 September 2026, Frazer Brookes. The profile described his YouTube channel and podcast as dormant, from a 28 August 2026 reading. Both resumed in September 2026, and the profile describes them as active in bursts.
• 2 October 2026, Amy Starr Allen. The profile paraphrased a line from her 2011 post inside quotation marks. It now quotes her exactly ("went on to spend an hour on the phone with me"). The meaning is unchanged.
• 8 October 2026, Erik Christian Johnson. The profile named his edge "The Content Annuity": a blog archive that kept recruiting for him after he stopped writing. He has sold that blog to Mike Schiemer and now recruits through daily YouTube review videos for GreatLife Worldwide. The edge is now "The Review Loop," and the profile was re-reported from his channels, their links and the blog's About page.
• 15 October 2026, Aurelien Amacker. The profile gave the systeme.io affiliate commission as 40% lifetime. systeme.io's affiliate page, read on 15 October 2026, states 60% on every sale, recurring for life. The profile now gives 60%, and its account of the 2019–2024 growth no longer attaches a rate to those years.
• 15 October 2026, Holton Buggs. The profile was rebuilt from a full research run against the court record. It had described him as the top net winner of Traders Domain with a $75.9 million figure that no court or Receiver document uses; it had called four of his ventures collapsed, iBuumerang frozen and sold, and a New Zealand FMA notice a fraud warning; and it had his Houston home headed to auction. The profile now cites the CFTC case and the Receiver's filings directly, describes iBuumerang's merger into Risen Live and the FMA caution notice as their documents state them, records the sale of the home with the Receiver's consent in December 2025, and adds the 2018 AmeriSciences jury verdict affirmed by the Fifth Circuit in 2019. Score, tier and caution note were restated from the new evidence.
• 15 October 2026, Igor Alberts. The profile was rebuilt from a full research run. It had counted five vehicles with four collapsed (the record shows four crypto-linked companies, two still operating), described a 2024 rent dispute as a tribunal settlement (it was a court case in summary proceedings), attributed a 2026 Instagram handle to him that does not name him, and gave him a personal role in OmegaPro that no primary record supports. Every company-level matter now states that no court, regulator or prosecutor names him and that he has not been charged. Income grade, score and tier were restated from the new evidence.
• 15 October 2026, Andreea Cimbala. The profile was rebuilt from a full research run. It had said her personal domain was lapsed and that she ran no capture page, offer or list; the domain was re-registered on 5 June 2026 and runs a newsletter opt-in and a paid subscription for her team. It had described a $65 million figure as her own scrubbed self-report (it is a BusinessForHome headline, still archived) and listed OmegaPro among her companies, which no primary record supports. Every company-level matter now states that no action names her and no charge was found. Income grade, score and tier were restated from the new evidence.
• 15 October 2026, Sarah Robbins. The profile was rebuilt from a full research run. It had placed her in Michigan (she lives in Southern California; Michigan is where she started), dated her Shaklee start to February 2025 (she was building there in the second half of 2024; February 2025 is the upload date of an open-house video), credited her with a Shaklee rank no source names, and combined two separate team-size and sales claims into one. The profile now presents her team-sales figures as her own statements beside Rodan + Fields' published company revenue. Income grade and score were restated from the new evidence.
• 15 October 2026, Mike Hobbs. The profile was rebuilt from a full research run. It had credited him with a college degree (the degree is Christy Hobbs'; he says he completed 15 of 41 credits), dated his first $100,000 year, his military service and his start online inaccurately, described a "2021–23 pivot" to tutorials (his channel has led with tutorials since 2012), and implied that a 2017 Texas order about USI-Tech concerned him (the order names the company and two other agents, not him). The profile now uses the Home Business Academy's own income disclosure as the primary income record. Income grade, score and tier were restated from the new evidence.
• 16 October 2026, Brian Carruthers. The profile was rebuilt from a full research run. It had placed him in Maryland (he lives in Virginia), dated his book to 2015 (it was first published in January 2014), treated a BusinessForHome "$25M club" item as independent corroboration (it is a press release built on his own quotes), cited a software vendor's blog for his monthly income, and said no court record named him. A 2014 Oklahoma case, Pre-Paid Legal Services v. Fraser, names him and his company as third-party defendants; the profile now reports it as allegations with his answer and counterclaim, and no ruling. LegalShield's own recognition records now carry the income grade. Income grade and score were restated from the new evidence.
• 16 October 2026, Jeff Aman. The profile was rebuilt from a full research run. It carried no editor disclosure, although the editor holds a live LiveGood position; the disclosure now opens the page. It had him shipping a free system in his first week (he joined LiveGood in January 2023 and launched the funnel in April), described a steady video cadence (he posted four videos in each of 2024 and 2025), dated his blog wrongly, gave a monthly income figure no source supports, and tagged his #1 rank as corroborated when the only source is his own leaderboard. LiveGood is now shown as his former main company; his 2026 business is his own funnel. Income grade, score and cohort were restated from the new evidence.
• 16 October 2026, Ivan Tapia. The profile was rebuilt from a full research run. It had described a 2022 lawsuit by International Markets Live as dropped within days and settled (the company refiled in Nevada state court, he answered and counterclaimed, and no ruling on the claims against him has been located), said RIMAN publishes no US income disclosure (it publishes a North American disclosure, dated May 2026), listed his role as a distributor (RIMAN introduces him as VP of Sales for Latin America), said his income figures come only from listicles, and called his long-form video retired. It also misdated his book and his OneBillion brand. Score was restated from the new evidence.
• 16 October 2026, Rolf Kipp. The profile was rebuilt from a full research run. It had presented the FTC's April 2026 case against Forever Living as a company-only matter; the complaint names him, and the profile now reports what it alleges, as allegations, and that he is not a defendant. It had cited a Forbes Austria profile as editorial (it is a paid advertiser placement), credited him with a lifetime figure no source supports, described the System4Win and you4WIN tools as his monopoly (other companies operate them), and misdated his early career and his books. Score was restated from the new evidence.
• 16 October 2026, Jenna Zwagil. The profile was rebuilt from a full research run. It carried no editor disclosure, although the editor is a former MyDailyChoice affiliate; the disclosure now opens the page. It had presented a $1.06 million monthly figure as published by MyDailyChoice and reduced after a self-regulatory case (the figure is a BusinessForHome estimate, and the 2020 decision does not name her), overstated her YouTube activity, called a direct-message handle a community, described her role as master distributor (she was co-founder and chief marketing officer), and left out her 2025 role as chief executive of a crypto trading-bot program and two settled civil cases that name her. Income grade and score were restated from the new evidence.
• 16 October 2026, Jordan Adler. The profile was rebuilt from a full research run. It carried no editor disclosure, although the editor holds a live SendOutCards position and Adler is his sponsor there; the disclosure now opens the page. It had linked a YouTube channel that belongs to someone else and a parked domain, said he runs no funnel or email capture (he has used both since 2008), presented his organization-size figures as corroborated (they are his own and vary), and described the company's later disclosures as capping his income without noting that they report averages per account. The founder's 2010 statement and the company's disclosures now carry the income grade. Income grade and score were restated from the new evidence.
• 16 October 2026, Kody Bateman. The profile was rebuilt from a full research run. It carried no editor disclosure, although the editor holds a live SendOutCards position; the disclosure now opens the page. It had called him the company's CEO (Gregg Bryars held that role from 2019 to 2022, and Bateman's title is Chief Visionary Officer), described his TEDx training as gated (it was open in every capture checked), said he tells his founding story identically (his own tellings vary on the interval), and graded his income on a revenue figure that is a third-party estimate. The company's reported revenue and his own statements now carry the record, and a 2016 federal case in which he and the company took no position is reported as it reads. Income grade, score and tier were restated from the new evidence.
• 16 October 2026, Paul Hutchings. The profile was rebuilt from a full research run. It had said he earns on every sale twice (under the company's one-tier plan he earns the referral commission only on customers he refers himself), graded his income on a third-party screenshot, undercounted his podcast and blog output, described the founders' calls as weekly (they run five days a week), and included details about a family member's health, which the site does not publish. The Home Business Academy's own income disclosure and his own statement that his share of payouts is "a small percentage" now carry the income record. Income grade, score and tier were restated from the new evidence.
• 16 October 2026, Tim Miller. The profile was rebuilt from a full research run. It carried no editor disclosure, although the editor holds a live LiveGood position and Miller sits in his upline; the disclosure now opens the page. It had built his edge on a top-of-matrix position at LiveGood's launch (by his own account he joined in late 2022 and sits under others in the matrix, and his posted pay statements are almost entirely matching income), said he publishes no dollar amounts and that LiveGood publishes no income disclosure (he has posted statements and totals; LiveGood's disclosure page exists but shows no figures), and cited a LinkedIn page as LiveGood's own (it is an affiliate's page). Income grade, score and tier were restated from the new evidence.
• 16 October 2026, Nauder Khazan. The profile was rebuilt from a full research run. It carried no editor disclosure, although the editor holds a live LiveGood position; the disclosure now opens the page. It had placed him in LiveGood's founding circle from December 2022 (LiveGood's team page lists him from its earliest capture, June 2022), called his earlier history unknown (he co-founded AliveMax in 2009 and founded Stiforp in 2011), and left out that LiveGood's plan reuses core figures from Stiforp's 2011 plan, a design the record credits to him and Ben Glinsky together. It had also graded income that no source shows: nothing public documents his pay, equity or affiliate position. Income grade, score and tier were restated from the new evidence.
• 16 October 2026, Aurelien Amacker. The profile was rebuilt from a full research run. It had dated systeme.io's founding to 2017 (the company was registered in Ireland in February 2016 and the product launched in 2018), presented third-party revenue estimates as corroborated figures, paired 2022 affiliate statistics with today's commission rate, described his personal brand as modest (he runs a YouTube channel of more than a thousand videos), and reversed the order of his 2010 career change. His own revenue statements, the company's payout figures and its Irish registration now carry the record. Income grade, score and tier were restated from the new evidence.
• 16 October 2026, Ben Glinsky. The profile was rebuilt from a full research run. It carried no editor disclosure, although the editor holds a live LiveGood position; the disclosure now opens the page. It had dated LiveGood's founding to December 2022 (the company was incorporated in Florida in April 2021), presented third-party estimates as company figures, and left out the 2018 arbitration award that found him and his former company liable for trademark infringement, and the company-level regulatory record, including an open investigation by New Zealand's Commerce Commission that names no individual. Income grade, score and tier were restated from the new evidence.
• 16 October 2026, Curry Russell. The profile was rebuilt from a full research run. It carried no editor disclosure, although the editor holds a live LiveGood position; the disclosure now opens the page. It had dated his Diamond rank to December 2024 (he reached it about March 2023, 77 days after joining), cited a software vendor's estimate as his income, accepted his "2,000+ personally enrolled" figure as consistent with his own earlier statements (they are unreconciled), and described his YouTube channel as active (it has since been removed by YouTube). Income grade and score were restated from the new evidence.
• 16 October 2026, Cory Draper. The profile was rebuilt from a full research run. It carried no editor disclosure, although the editor holds live positions in LiveGood and in a lead program Draper has promoted; the disclosure now opens the page. It had described seventeen years of near-daily video production (most of his uploads came after he joined LiveGood in March 2023), attributed his channel's views to his LiveGood work (most come from older trucking and road videos), said he had no email capture or courses (he runs an opt-in page and resells a course), and said no income evidence existed (he states his rank, leaderboard position and signups on camera). Income grade, score and tier were restated from the new evidence.
• 16 October 2026, Spencer Mecham. The profile was rebuilt from a full research run. It carried no editor disclosure, although Mecham is a paid affiliate of two programs in which the editor holds live positions; the disclosure now opens the page. It had described a $1 million ClickFunnels figure as award-verified (ClickFunnels' own materials confirm a Dream Car win, a six-figure income and a "#1 Affiliate" title, but no dollar figure; the $1 million is his own statement), cited a paid press release as a Yahoo Finance feature, credited his results to evergreen YouTube (by his account paid search scaled the run), and listed a course price and front-end offer that are no longer current. Income grade and score were restated from the new evidence.
• 16 October 2026, Erik Christian Johnson. The profile was rebuilt from a full research run. It carried no editor disclosure, although the editor holds a live LiveGood position and was a My Daily Choice affiliate; the disclosure now opens the page. It had credited his LiveGood growth to an aged blog (by his own account it came from YouTube), described him as having left LiveGood (he says he still earns from it), put his start in network marketing at about 2010 (2014), treated recruit counts on a blog he no longer owned as his own, and cited vendor listicles for his income. Income grade and score were restated from the new evidence.
• 16 October 2026, Greg Chambers. The profile was rebuilt from a full research run. It had dated Traffic Authority's launch to about 2016 (it launched in August 2015), credited him with 18 to 20 years in the business on the strength of a homepage line unchanged since 2017 (the documented record starts in 2008), said his company runs no secondary business (it also operates Traffic Ignition, Affiliate Mentor and List Leverage), and stated an owner income no source supports. The editor's disclosure now also names his former List Leverage position, whose agreement is with the same company. Income grade, score and tier were restated from the new evidence.
• 16 October 2026, David Sharpe. The profile was rebuilt from a full research run. It carried no editor disclosure, although the editor was an Empower Network affiliate during Sharpe's time as its president; the disclosure now opens the page. It had described an April 2026 product overhaul that did not happen (Legendary Marketer's closure was announced in February 2026 and access ended 31 March), dated the company's founding to 2016 (2017), listed a current offer whose site no longer resolves, attributed another founder's monthly figure to him, and left out two closed lawsuits that named him, neither of which produced a finding. Income grade, score and tier were restated from the new evidence.
• 16 October 2026, Jonathan Montoya. The profile was rebuilt from a full research run. It carried no editor disclosure, although Montoya promotes two programs in which the editor holds live affiliate positions; the disclosure now opens the page. It had presented a 75% commission for course buyers as his current offer (it ran from 2021 to 2022; the program now pays 40%, or 50% for course buyers), quoted a course price that is no longer current, described the program as a one-tier structure (its own pages have carried a second tier), cited a review-site estimate of his operating budget, and sourced his pricing and offers to third-party reviews rather than his own pages. Income grade, score and tier were restated from the new evidence.
• 16 October 2026, Rob Fore. The editor's own profile was rebuilt from a full research run held to the same standard as every other file. Its disclosure named only The Home Business Academy; it now opens the page and lists his seven live positions, his former ones, and his ties to other subjects in this series. It had dated his start to 2008 (he has sold online since 1996, through a company incorporated in 1998), described his YouTube channel as reset (it kept its subscribers and has posted 15 videos since late August), called a lead-generation site of his parked (it is live), attached a "$175K in 3 years" claim to the wrong program, and said his profile was published before any other subject's. Its ledger total of $3,394,502 had missed 34 of the 1,103 line items in the workbook on file; the reconciled total is $3,820,771, and the founder page now carries it. It now reports his 2012 recommendation of Zeek Rewards, which the SEC shut down that August, from archived copies of his own review page. Score was restated from the new evidence.
• 16 October 2026, Ray Higdon. The profile carried no editor disclosure, although the editor joined Numis Network in 2011 with Higdon as his sponsor and left within about three months. The disclosure now opens the page.
• 16 October 2026, David Wood. The profile carried no editor disclosure, although the editor was an Empower Network affiliate during Wood's time leading the company and Wood had prospected him for Numis Network in 2011. The disclosure now opens the page.

Copyright complaints

If your concern is that copyrighted material of yours appears here rather than a factual error, that runs through a separate process — see our DMCA / copyright policy. (We embed third-party media from its original platform rather than copying it, so most such concerns are resolved by removing an embed.)

← Browse the profiles · How we verify →