TOP EARNERS is an intelligence layer, not a fan club and not a watchdog. That only means something if the method is written down and followed the same way every time. This is that method — the same standard applied to our own founder as to everyone else.
Each profile documents how a top earner in MLM or affiliate marketing actually makes money and how the operation runs: the funnel, the channels, the offers, the comp plan, the public track record. It is built from public sources — pages, archives, videos, filings, comp documents, and back-office material where the subject has published it themselves.
A dossier deliberately does not tell you whether to join anything, and it is not investment, financial, business, or legal advice. It reports what is documented and grades how well it's documented. The decision is yours; the honest questions to ask are set out on every profile's "Thinking of Joining?" tab.
Every substantive claim in a dossier carries one of four tags, placed next to the sentence it qualifies, so you can see the strength of each claim rather than taking ours:
Each profile carries an income-evidence grade from A to D. This is the single most misread thing on the site, so to be explicit: the grade measures how well a subject's income is documented — not how much they earn, and not their character or the quality of their business.
A Grade A means back-office screenshots, checks, tax records, or an accounting ledger we could inspect. A Grade D means the only figures available are self-reported or third-hand. A low grade means weak documentation, nothing more — a subject may earn a great deal and still grade low simply because they don't publish proof. Grades can move: a subject who submits documentation can raise their own grade, because the evidence moved (see claiming a profile).
We never publish a net worth figure, for anyone, including our founder. Income can be documented; net worth can't be from the public record, which doesn't show a person's other investments, unreported income, inheritance, property, debts or taxes. Every profile says what can and can't be verified about it and prints no number.
We separate fact from opinion, and we don't use loaded labels as if they were findings. Words like "scam," "fraud," "ponzi," or "pyramid" are not applied to a person in our own voice. Where those words appear, they are either quoting or attributing a regulator or court, describing a company that is actually the subject of adjudicated proceedings, or naming an objection in order to weigh it — always attributed, never asserted as our own conclusion about an individual.
Some subjects are connected to regulatory actions, collapsed programs, or live litigation. Those profiles carry a visible ⚠ Caution file badge and a short note explaining why. In a caution file, allegations are reported as allegations, attributed to the body making them, and clearly distinguished from anything a court has actually decided. An open case is described as an open case — never as a verdict.
Every profile is independent editorial coverage, and every subject is invited to engage with theirs. A subject (or an authorized representative) can verify control of channels already listed on their profile and then publish a right of reply — their words, attributed, dated, and unedited — alongside the dossier.
Claiming grants voice, never veto. A claimant can reply, correct links, and submit documentation to raise the income grade on evidence. A claimant cannot edit or delete the dossier, change a grade by paying, or remove a caution flag. That boundary is the whole point: the findings are worth something precisely because they aren't for sale. Full process: claim a profile.
If something is factually wrong, we want to know and we fix it. Anyone — subject or reader — can report an error; no claim required. We aim to acknowledge reports within 5 business days, we correct verified errors with a dated note, and truthful-but-unflattering content stays. Removal of accurate content is never for sale. The full policy, including how disputes are handled, is on the Corrections & dispute policy page.
This site earns money in ways we disclose: marked affiliate links, and paid access to the full dossiers. None of it touches the findings. An affiliate relationship, a purchase, or a claimed profile never changes a grade, a caution flag, a fact, or a verdict. That firewall is stated on every profile and it is the reason the editorial judgment is worth paying for at all. See the site Terms and Privacy Policy for how the products and your data are handled.